This week I explored two instructional
strategies that embed technology from Using
Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works. The first strategy is “Cues,
Questions, and Advance Organizers” and the second strategy is “Summarizing and
Note Taking.” I found both of these strategies to be quite useful for classroom
instruction.
The best way to describe the first strategy
is that it “focuses on enhancing students’ ability to retrieve, use, and
organize information about a topic” (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski,
2007, p. 73). This strategy aligns with the principles of the cognitive
learning theory. This strategy really stresses the importance of utilizing an
organizer to gather concepts and thoughts into a more organized format that is clear
and easy to read. Many of the advance organizers can include images and text
that supports Paivio’s dual coding hypothesis (Laureate Education, Inc., 2010).
This is a great way for students to begin piecing together content in a way
that is easy for them to remember. As stated in the “Cognitive Learning Theory”
video, “Images are really powerful tools to use in the classroom” (Laureate
Education, Inc., 2010). I think they can be great representations and visuals
for students to see in their minds to capture and process the information. It
was also suggested that multimedia can be incorporated into the cueing and
questioning process (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007). This is another great tool for the cognitive
learning process because it is another method of sensory input of information (Laureate
Education, Inc., 2010). The “Cues, Questions, and Advance Organizers” will help
me teach for understanding because it helps me see the information the students
are processing and I can incorporate higher-level or lower-level questioning to
gauge student learning and to make sure all of the students understand the
content.
The second strategy is “Summarizing and Note
Taking.” This strategy “focuses on enhancing students’ ability to synthesize
information and distill it into a concise new form” (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn,
& Malenoski, 2007, p. 119). The idea of summarizing and note taking is to
take content and to effectively break it down into parts that your brain can easily
understand. One of the tools mentioned in Using
Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works is Inspiration. This
program is designed with templates where you can incorporate any type of data
into an organizer. It is easy to read and is to the point. Lengthy word
descriptions are minimal and key points are identified. This strategy
correlates with the cognitive learning theory because it allows the reader to
take pieces of information at one time and to apply it and using it in
short-term memory and eventually transcribing it into long-term memory
(Laureate Education, Inc., 2010). Note-taking can be an elaborate process,
however, it should be presented in various ways (Pitler, Hubbell,
Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007). Elaboration is a component of the cognitive
learning theory and is a primary way to store information long-term (Laureate
Education, Inc., 2010). This instructional strategy will help me teach for
understanding because it will allow me to see students who are synthesizing the
information presented and if they are appropriately applying the content.
References
Laureate Education, Inc.
(Executive Producer). (2010). [Webcast]. Cognitive learning
theories. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Pitler H.,
Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Emily,
ReplyDeleteAre there any graphic organizers you use in your math classroom?
Brian
I do use a couple of graphic organizers. When I teach rational and irrational numbers I have a chart that I use. I am always looking for more though because I think they can be really helpful! I also use a T-chart for when we do one, two, and multi step equations. Do you use any in your classroom?
ReplyDeleteI really couldn't think of any graphic organizers that I use until I read your post. I forgot that I also use a chart for rational and irrational numbers. I have never tried this, but maybe a graphic organizer that compares all the topics covered and displays the topics in a way that students can see how each are related? I feel like I am short of ideas for this week.
ReplyDeleteBrian,
DeleteHonestly, the usage of concept mapping in math is not as "easy" to create as it might be in other subjects. Maybe I just have not found it to be as "easy" because I don't utilize them all that much. I had a little bit of difficult creating a map for this week, but I did create one for surface area of pyramids that I could share with you if interested. It is pretty basic, but it's always a resource! :)
Emily
Emily,
ReplyDeleteWould an organizer such as a concept map be of use in math? I know after doing the research this week I think they would be of great use in music. I was thinking along the lines of geometry and cross-linking new theorems to learned ones. Not sure if I'm totally making sense, I haven't thought deeply about geometry in a long time so forgive me if I'm spouting nonsense!
David,
DeleteI actually do not use concept maps all that much in my classroom. In my opinion, I feel that it is not as easy to utilize/create as it might be in a language arts or social studies classroom.
I do think they can be beneficial, but I would need to go back and look at my math content to see how I can incorporate them into my lessons. I typically use guided notes in my classroom, but the usage of a concept map is a good supplement to the content.
How do you see it working for music? That's great you see it being of great use in music.
Emily
I love that advanced organizers made on the computer allow you to add imagines. As you referenced imagines aid in dual coding and helping students retain and recall information in long term memory. It seems to me that advanced organizers might be tricky to use in math instruction. How do you find ways to use them?
ReplyDelete